Reuters news agency published an anti-Trump hit piece overnight in which the reporters tried further burying the President, but within it is a major admission that people are ignoring.
While the piece attempts to detail numerous times that the President’s campaign was in contact with the Russians, their sources told them that there was “no evidence” anyone in the campaign did anything wrong. In fact, the back channel communications were specifically intended to subvert the U.S. national security bureaucracy, but not for the reasons people are thinking.
Check it out, via Paul Joseph Watson at InfoWars:
Although presented as another major scoop designed to damage Trump, the article, which is based on intelligence sources, completely vindicates him.
“Michael Flynn and other advisers to Donald Trump’s campaign were in contact with Russian officials and others with Kremlin ties in at least 18 calls and emails during the last seven months of the 2016 presidential race, current and former U.S. officials familiar with the exchanges told Reuters.”
However, the true substance of the story is buried down in paragraph six.
“The people who described the contacts to Reuters said they had seen no evidence of wrongdoing or collusion between the campaign and Russia in the communications reviewed so far,” states the report.
The article also highlights how the back channel communications were made with Russia in an attempt to “bypass the U.S. national security bureaucracy, which both sides considered hostile to improved relations.”
So there you have it. According to leaking sources for the liberal media, Trump’s team was trying to repair relations with a fellow superpower, not collude with the Russians to win an election, but they knew that the deep state wants war with the Russians instead.
Is it really such a bad thing to want better relationships across the globe?