There’s increasing questions surrounding the “side agreements” the FBI made with some of Hillary Clinton’s top aides, and a new report is seriously causing people to question the bureau’s integrity.
An utterly stunning revelation was contained in a letter obtained from the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) – the FBI gave permission to both Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson to literally “destroy” their laptops after the bureau conducted its investigation.
This is absolutely unbelievable.
Reporter Tyler Durden from Zero Hedge cherry picked the important parts of Goodlatte’s letter to Attorney General Loretta Lynch, in which he specifically asked why the FBI appears to have been colluding with Hillary to avoid finding the truth.
Check it out:
As part of the Judiciary Committee’s ongoing oversight of Secretary Clinton’s unauthorized use of a private email server during her tenure as Secretary of State, the Justice Department (DOJ) provided in camera review’ of certain immunity agreements. After a specific request from the Committee, based on references made in the immunity agreements to certain “side agreements,” DOJ subsequently provided in camera review of those “side agreements” between DOJ, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and Beth Wilkinson, the lawyer representing both Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson. Like many things about this case, these new materials raise more questions than answers. Please provide a written response to the below questions and make DOJ staff available for a briefing on this matter no later than October 10, 2016.
Why did the FBI agree to destroy both Cheryl Mills’ and Heather Samuelson’s laptops after concluding its search?
Doesn’t the willingness of Ms. Mills and Ms. Samuelson to have their laptops destroyed by the FBI contradict their claim that the laptops could have been withheld because they contained non-relevant, privileged information? If so, doesn’t that undermine the claim that the side agreements were necessary?
Please explain why DOJ agreed to limit their search of the Mills and Samuelson laptops to a date no later than January 31, 2015and therefore give up any opportunity to find evidence related to the destruction of evidence or obstruction of justice related to Secretary Clinton’s unauthorized use of a private email server during her tenure as Secretary of State.
Why was this time limit necessary when Ms. Mills and Ms. Samuelson were granted immunity for any potential destruction of evidence charges?
Please confirm whether a grand jury was convened to investigate Secretary Clinton’s unauthorized use of a private email server. Disclosure is authorized under Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(3)(A)(i) and (e)(3)(D).
Is this America anymore? Nobody, and I do mean not a soul, in the FBI is enforcing the law any longer.
What happened with Hillary and her server is the biggest political scandal since Whitewater, yet it’s being neatly swept under the rug by everyone in our government, including the one bureau that’s supposed to be separated from partisan politics.
If you needed any more reason to vote for Trump, this should be it – Hillary will continue the lawlessness and subversion of our Constitution, which is already hanging by a thread thanks to the corruption metastasizing in our government.